Delay in Content Posting

Hey guys, just a short note that i wouldn't be active in blogging due to school work and all. Moreover i am still thinking on do. Meanwhile you can look at my instagram @qibcentric for posts and all. If you have any topics i can do on, you may wish to comment or DM via instagram :(

Thank you :)
BucketUrPhotos

EF vs EF-S Lens Showdown!

Welcome back to another post!

If you are a canon user, you might have known about EF lenses and EF-S lenses. You might sometimes wonder what are the differences. There are also myths pertaining to that and I'm here to clear em out!

In my previous post on CROP (APS-C) vs FULL FRAME, we talked about the types of DSLR available.

Now it is the type of lenses that are used in both systems.

EF lenses are both compatible with Full Frame and APS-C cameras.

However. EF-S lenses are only compatible with APS-C cameras. Canon's lineup of lenses made for APS-C cameras would not fit full frame bodies due to the extra black ring at the bottom of the lens mount. EF lenses don't have that which is why it can be used on full frame (and APS-C, since the black ring is 'extra')

If you look closely in the pictire, there is a caved-in black ring inside the 7DmkII (an APS-C DSLR) while the 5DmkIII (Full frame DSLR) does not have that

(cred: http://i.ytimg.com/vi/NBp_2wRmtrQ/maxresdefault.jpg )


There are two differences to take note of:

1) The Extra Black Ring on top of the lens mount.

 EF lenses do not have that as it is made to be used on Full Frame cameras which does not have the black ring. EF-S lenses on the other hand has that black ring.

(as seen here, the EF lens on the left doesn't have the black ring unlike the EF-S lens on the right)
(lenses used: EF 50mm f/1.8 STM on left & EF-S 18-135m f/3.5-5.6 IS STM on the right)




2) the mount labels.

 In APS-C cameras there will be two 'labels' - A red dot and a white square box on the rim of the metallic mount on the DSLR.

Full Frame Cameras however only has a red dot.

By now you might have figured out that EF lenses are the ones with the red dot, while EF-S lenses is the one with the White box. 

So now you might wonder why they even created EF-S lenses right? There's already EF lenses so why EF-S?

Back in the days, EF lenses were a bit expensive for normal people like you and me to buy. Since majority of camera users use APS-C sensor DSLR (since it is cheap and the best choice for beginners), Canon came up with the EF-S lens series - which is ONLY for APS-C and it is cheaper because it uses lesser amount of glass and optics to construct the lens.This is why normally in the market, the EF-S lenses are cheaper compared to EF lenses 

(excluding EF 50mm f/1.8 STM which is really cheap and the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 lens)

Moreover EF-S lenses are created to 'somewhat match' the focal lengths on a full frame.

For example, using a Canon EF-S 10-18mm lens on an APS-C gives an equivalent Full Frame field of view of 16-28.8mm

This is almost similar to the field of view on a Full Frame using an EF 16-35mm f/2.8 IS USM II L lens ( although on APS-C it doesn't really cover until 35mm but close enough)

There are also rumours that the crop factor (in APS-C DSLR) only works if you use an EF lenses but using EF-S lenses negate the crop factor. This is highly inaccurate.

APS-C cameras will have the crop factor (1.5x for Nikon etc and 1.6x for Canon) BY DEFAULT for ANY lenses used on it.. So don't be tricked by this.

Well that comes to the end of my blog post! Please do give feedback on what to cover and how to improve this page! Your feedback is very much appreciated!

CROP (APS-C) vs FULL FRAME: An In-Depth Analysis

Hey guys welcome back! sorry for the extreme delay for my new post as i was really busy with exams and all.

So yeah welcome to BucketUrPhotos! This is a blog about photography and i post contents about it and also give tips and tricks on improving or 'see from a wider perspective'

To address one of the reader's questions.......

"Can you explain what is the difference between a crop body and full frame body and what are the differences?"

So in this post i shall compare the two and ALSO give a more elaborated view on what sizes of image sensors are being used in our daily life

CROP vs FULL FRAME - What's that?

If you are a DSLR user you might have heard the word 'crop body' and 'full frame' before. So what is that?

(body = a DSLR but without the lens, hence the word body as it is literally just a body without the lens)

Basically a crop body is a camera body that uses an APS-C sensor and a full frame body is a camera body with a 35mm image sensor!

Hold your thoughts, I'm gonna explain what's all that about

You see, back in the days film was used and the 35mm format was known as the small format. As we ushered the era of digital photography, the 35mm format was then known as 'full frame' and was kept but was just too expensive due to its sensor size, thus the birth of smaller digital sensors such as APS-C and so on.

as shown in the pic, this is the comparison of the sizes (cr: http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/fullframe/image_circle.jpg)

types of canon DSLRs series that are

•   'crop bodies' (the '*' is denoted as the numbers you see on the body)

1. -****D series, (eg 1000D)
2. ***D series(eg 750D)
3. **D series (eg 60D)
4. 7D and 7D Mk II, which is an exception in the '*D' series 

• full frame bodies

1. 5D series ( mark I,II,III,s and SR)
2. 6D
3. 1Ds mk II, 1Ds mk III and the famous powerhouse the 1D-X

Okay but still what is the difference?

Well for starters, the crop factor

Crop Factor

To Explain crop factor, let's think of a scenario now

Imagine you are using a small rectangular hole to see what's on the other side and you can relatively see what is on the other side right? (equate hole to Full Frame)

Now, imagine that the rectangular hole just got smaller (equate to APS-C)

Can you see as wide as before?

That is what crop factor is about. In the example just now you realised APS-C is more 'cropped' (thus the name crop body') and has a limited Field Of View (FOV) unlike the Full Frame which has a wider view.

An example is shown here (cr:http://myfirstdslr.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/APS-C.jpg)

This further explains the definition of crop factor.

the crop factor for canon APS-C sensor is 1.6x and Nikon has a crop factor of 1.5x. this is applied by multiplying the crop factor to the focal length of your lens. (focal length is the number on your lens ,eg: 18-135mm, 50mm, 35mm. )

we shall take an example of the FOV of both bodies using a Canon 24-105mm f/4 'L' lens

On a full frame: 24-105mm

On APS-C (for Nikon) : (24-105mm) x 1.5 = 36-157.5mm equivalent ^

On APS-C (for Canon) : (24-105mm) x 1.6 = 38.4-168mm equivalent

^note: canon lenses do not fit Nikon bodies unless you have an adapter to do so

the calculations is made to determine the actual FOV on a full frame. Meaning 105mm on APS-C is as same as 157.5mm (Nikon) or 168mm (for Canon) on a full frame.

If you think about it, crop factor can be essential at some instances. For wildlife and sports you definitely need the crop factor to shoot even further without moving closer to the subject (especially wildlife- You wouldn't wanna go close to a lion right?)

Crop factor can also help if you want to shoot the moon. for example if you are using a Tamron 150-600mm lens, the crop factor allows you to shoot even further and up close to the moon (600 x 1.6 = 960mm) compared to full frame which can only be shot at a max focal length of 600mm.

But there is one more main factor that differentiates APS-C and full frame......

NOISE PERFORMANCE

Noise performance in APS-C is generally poorer than full frame. Full frame is better if you're shooting in low light as the noise would not affect as much as how it does on an APS-C sensor. Full frame has a bigger sensor so it isn't as dense as an APS-C sensor and therefore photos when shot on low light is not as 'grainy' as a shot from an APS-C camera

here is a photo as an example (cr: http://keyassets.timeincuk.net/inspirewp/live/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2011/02/5d_vs_7d_images1.jpg )

As you can see the photos taken on the 5D mk II is not as grainy as the ones taken using a 7D. Due to the smaller sensor, the noise is more 'packed' and therefore more evident compared to full frame, as mentioned having a larger sensor and reducing this problem.

TYPE OF BODY

With exception to 7D series and maybe old discontinued models,  all APS-C DSLRs by canon is all plastic body and is not weather-sealed meaning if you are going to shoot in the cold or under tough weather conditions, it is not advisable to do so. 7D series uses magnesium alloy construct and is the only APS-C camera in the canon lineups that is able to withstand the tough weather.

Full Frame bodies are all constructed using magnesium alloy, except 6D which is a 50-50 on plastic and magnesium alloy.

All APS-C cameras have a built in popup flash while full frame does not have that (After all, Full frame is for the pros! They would use external flashgun and all instead of a pop up flash)

Now comes the ultimate question:

''Who are the target audience for both types of cameras?"

The answer is pretty obvious and simple. 

If you are just a beginner and on a tighter budget, you might want to start out with an APS-C DSLR and learn the fundamentals first. If you are taking it to the professional level, shooting in tough weather and require better noise performance and so on, full frame is advisable. (although 7D mk II kind of bridges the gap and relatively cheaper)

Kick-Start Pointers 101

(HEY GUYS sorry for the extreme delay for my post! barely any time to even post stuff once semester  stared so yeah.

for newcomers, WELCOME TO BUCKETURPHOTOS! this is a place where you can learn, be it total beginner or intermediates, how to improve and all! more posts will be coming soon so yeah! )



So now you know how to use your camera and change the settings and so on? Congratulations you made past the first stage

Photography is mostly about creativity and telling your viewers a message or to captivate their hearts. For beginners you might also learn that sometimes the equipment you use doesn't really matter if you know how to manage with what you have. 

'Maximising the usage and maintaining the minimal equipment you have properly is better than having a lot of equipment and not knowing how to use it fully and unable to maintain it properly'

- A sound advice my teacher gave me before he retired. I found it really true. So what if you have those very advanced and big lenses when you don't know how to maximise its output?

So let me cut down the story and tell you the pointers you might need to follow

1. Get yourself a proper kit. This is after you've mastered your basics and feel that you want to bring it to the next level. Just keep it simple. Usually my recommendation is a tripod, extra battery, 18-55mm or 18-135mm lens, a bag, and maybe a flash gun ( if you are into event coverage/ step up the game)
    If possible try to get a 50mm f1.8 portrait lens! it's the cheapest lens offered by canon and it does a pretty decent job! (review coming soon, if you could i suggest to buy the new lens as it's much better than the predecessor )
   
   
                 vs  
   50mm f1.8 ii, commonly known                           NEWLY RELEASED canon 50mm
   as the 'nifty-fifty' due to its price                           f1.8 STM lens, the much better
   and its cheap built                                                  upgrade of the predecessor.
   
   
   (crL http://www.kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/50mm-f18.htm) and                                        
   http://www.audiovideopro.net/canon-launches-new-ef-50mm-f1-8-stm-prime-lens/
   
   
2. If you are doing full-day shooting or those lazy to charge frequently and just want to 'take out and shoot' , i recommend you to get a battery grip. It is an add-on to your camera that enables to have a longer battery life and also allows you to take photos in the portrait orientation easily, as there's a shutter button and a dial at the battery grip. No more having a hard time taking portraits! The only disadvantage some might have is the weight. Adding that chunk might make some people uneasy to use the camera.
   
   for most battery grips, you have the option to either use 2 canon DSLR batteries or 6 AA batteries so it's more convenient
   
   
   
   
   
   a sample battery grip, different battery grips for different canon DSLR models, so be careful when you buy one! (credits: https://www.tokopedia.com/prodigital/battery-grip-canon-bg-e8-for-camera-canon-eos-550d-600d-650d-700d)
3. Shoot regularly and explore: and yeap, 'practice makes perfect' . You got to be well-versed with your camera - from camera settings such as ISO, shutter speed to knowing how to change them and many other setttings. This will also train you in a way to 'see' from another perspective. Remember: photography is about perspective. You are like the artist with the paint on his hands and canvas. You call the shots! (pun not intended). I usually practice during my vacation period and explore various places across the country.
4. Experiment techniques: never be too scared to try out new tricks ( unless you're shooting for a school or office event, because that might be a little risky. Too many bad shots in the name of 'experimenting' might not be accepted by others) 

          Try to experiment with things such as 'bokeh' (that part where your background gets blur, more            coming soon!), symmetry and so on. Remember, it is like art, but digitally!



An example is experimenting with angles, here i mounted my tripod and set an angle about 40 degrees upwards. It gives a perepective of the 'bottom to top' effect!)



       This is a vanishing point type. As you can see, the pathway gets vanished somewhat at the end of         the picture. This could be symmetrical if both sides are 100% similar but they aren't this pic

Well that comes to a conclusion of this post! If you have any questions or any particular areas you would like me to cover, please feel free to comment in the box! 

Till my next post!

Follow me on instagram @qibcentric for more photos!

ETA of next post

Hey guys welcome back! Due to unforeseen circumstances and all, i regret to inform that the publishing of my next post will be delayed. So yeah sorry about that!

Check out soon alright! It'll be done by this month!

Cheers!

Raqib Zaahed

Developing The Eye: What can I take pictures of?

(Introduction: Welcome back to bucketyourphotos.blogspot.com ! This is a page for beginners who just pick up on photography and also for people to know more on how to improve in photography!)

(Now to continue where I left in my previous post!)

What can I take pictures of?

That might be the next question in your head right now. I mean, now you have a camera that works well. 

But what am I going to take pictures of? Surely not just something random and pointless such that people will criticise you for that. You want to take something that is eye-catching and captivates people right?

Well not to worry! I am here to give some ideas on topics you can take up to start your photography journey!

Photography isn't just restricted to some topics, there is endless exploration for photography.  

There are a lot of topics to choose from, but let me just name some of the topics i would like to share that might help the beginners (which will be explained at the later part )

• Portrait
• Architecture
• Sunset/ sunrise 

( more topics might come in the future posts! sorry about the delay)

All of these requires you to explore. Exploring around your surroundings is one of the most important characteristics of a photographer. Reason being is that the 'perfect' moment only happens for a few seconds ( especially portrait photography). 

Now, you might wonder what i mean by 'the perfect moment' ? 

For example, a person is doing something that you think is 'cool' and you wanna take a picture of it. You got to do it immediately. Most likely chances are that 'pose' is not going to be there forever. You might regret that you didn't grab the chance when you had it 

Let's see an example below. When I was exploring the room I saw one of my teacher's band members practicing. And the spotlight shined above him at that point in time. I found it 'cool' and then i decided to take a shot. Luckily, I did it before he changed his pose.

Hope that would make you realise why you have to be aware of your surroundings

The 'perfect moment' is only for a while, in MOST cases for a few seconds. You got to be fast and make sure you grab it before you lose it! Remember, grab it or lose it!

Portrait Photography

Portrait photography is taking pictures of people (duh). Mainly it's taking a picture of one person who is expressing their feelings, mood through facial expressions or physical actions. 

In events, it is highly recommended to take pictures of the people who are performing, or audience who are watching the performance ( but make sure they don't see you with a camera aiming at their faces! Some might not like it and some will come after you and i'm so not kidding about that )

For portrait photography, make sure the subject is the one that is being focused, and nothing else. (ie: try to blur out anything that is distracting and when people see the photo, they automatically see the subject and nothing else)

To just focus on your subject, make sure you have a lower aperture value on your DSLR/ hybrid camera. Also, set your focusing system to only focus at one point ( some  cameras call it a one point focus/ single point focus, but you get the idea)

Here is an example of a portrait photo I took during my first public photo shoot

To make things even simpler, just follow this simple rule 

1) observe and wait for the moment

2) If you think there's something that is going to make people's expression change, prepare your camera and the setting required ( fast shutter speed, lower aperture, 1 point AF focus and so on )

3) Focus the camera at them and make sure all background details are blurred

4) shoot!

Sounds easy, doesn't it?

Architectural Photography

Architectural photography is relatively easy, if you take a picture of an infrastructure that just make people go WOW when they see your photo. The hard part? Finding an infrastructure that is unique and/or taking it correctly (ie: no shakes,  not under/over exposed, focused) and also most importantly, impressing your audience with your shot.

But for architectural photography, you do not need to be very fast in taking photos, as the object is still going to be there, so you can take things at your pace and achieve the shot you desire patiently. No point going fast in shooting and getting less impressive shots in the end. So yea, just go slow and steady.

Here is an example ( well this is just an average shot. I took this when i was a beginner )

But of course, for architectural photography sometimes it's best if you can show a variety of design, showing the most ATTRACTIVE AND UNIQUE part of the infrastructure than the whole building which looks not so impressive. 

Also, the setting. Be it cloudy, raining or anything. Sometimes, the natural background behind your architectural shots can make a difference. After all, 'nothing looks majestic without a touch of natural element'

The general equation, to be exact is as follows:

Nice architecture design + Natural background   = higher chance of the WOW factor among audience

Here is an example on how Natural background can make your photo nicer

(PS: the second one was post edited )

See? when you compare the shot I took when I was a beginner and these shot, which I took 2 weeks ago, the second set seems better, doesn't it?

That's what I meant, people, when i meant the fact that sometimes you need a bit of natural element on your architectural photos!

So yeah that's about it for architectural photography! Sounds easy ain't it? Just keep practicing and also look out for examples from real professionals on instagram, facebook etc and I'm sure you will also take good photos!

Summary

1. Look out for nice and unique architecture ( be it the full building or a part of it)
2. adjust camera settings and take the shot
3. If you can, try to add the little bit of nature's touch in your shot ( eg reflections of cloud patterns while taking a glass building or nice orange sunset sky etc )
4. if you wish, you may experiment and take pictures in different angles, and see which is the best among those you take. ( trial and error, it works sometimes)

Key thing is, NEVER GIVE UP, TRY, TRY AND TRY TILL YOU GET IT RIGHT :)

Sunrise/ Sunset Photography

This is pretty basic. Just adjust your camera setting to take it clearly, with details of clouds. It doesn't matter if the buildings aren't being seen. As long as there is an outline of it and it looks good it's fine ( this technique is mainly used in silhouette photography, but you can use it for sunset/ sunrise photography too! Photography can be of a mixed genre. )

Here is an example

For sunset photography, the detail of the sky and the surrounding matters the most. If there are people/ building that are just blacked out, make sure the outline of the object is there (the silhouette of the object). The main focus should be the setting: the cloud pattern, the colour of sunset and so on.  It's pretty basic as all you need to do is take a shot that is able to impress the audience.

Key notes
1) look out for really captivating sunsets
2) adjust camera accordingly and focus well, mainly on the details of the sky during sunset ( and also the silhouette of the person/ object if any )
3) shoot! :)

It takes tons of practice, so don't be disheartened if results doesn't turn out well. You can check out examples of sunset photography on the internet to have a better understanding

sounds easy doesn't it? :)

Well, that comes to the end of my post. Please do feel free to give feedback on how to improve my blog and what else you think i should cover on my next post!

Cheers!

Starting The Journey

So now you have the interest to pick up photography as your new hobby but don't know how to start? Not to mention these myths are making you even more confused?

Common Myths

1. You DEFINITELY need to attend photography classes to learn the basics of photography
2. you need very high end cameras and those really big and expensive lenses to be good
3. you cannot learn by yourself and definitely need a tutor or someone to be babysitting you until you get it right
4. You need equipment such as tripod, flashgun etc to even start photography

Well I am now here to tell you that the myths are both true AND untrue

Now, what do i mean by that?

1)  You might need photography classes to have a better understanding, but it is not LIMITED to that. You can even self teach yourself Photography by seeing online tutorials, books and so on. Classes might help, but if you know the basics more or less, I would recommend you to Self learn or ask your fellow friends who are also into photography

2)  True, high end DSLRs do deliver better photos compared to entry level DSLRs and entry level DSLRs deliver better photos than a normal compact camera. But as the saying goes 'Just because you are a striker doesn't mean you can score goals' . What matters most, in fact is WHO is using the camera. An Example would be A total rookie using a EOS 1DX performing not as well as a professional photographer who is using a EOS 700D, even tho it's clearly evident that the EOS 1DX outperforms the EOS 700D in many ways.

EOS 1DX, used by real professionals, costs a bomb 

(cr: cinegrafistas.wordpress.com)

EOS 700D, an entry level DSLR, mostly used by beginners and intermediates

(cr: www.expertreviews.co.uk)

    It doesn't really matter what camera you use to start your photography journey. You can even just start out with something like a canon Powershot SX60 or Panasonic LUMIX ( these are hybrid cameras, which is both compact and offer most functions of a normal DSLR except that lens is IRREMOVABLE) and then upgrade to a entry level/ mid range DSLR like a EOS 700D or better

Canon Powershot SX60 HS, an example of a hybrid camera. 

(cr: www.fotosklad.ru)

Panasonic Lumix FZ-18, another example of a Hybrid camera. Hybrid cameras have a pretty much same functions like an entry level DSLR but the lens is irremovable. 

(cr: www.dpreview.com)

    Then Lenses. If you are not going to take it full fledged or just a beginner, just go with the lens that comes with your kit. Lens does not really matter till you bring photography to the next level.


3) This is  bulls**t. Please Don't ever heed to this at all. You CAN INDEED learn by yourself. That's how I did, with occasional feedback from teachers, friends and photographers whom i met during events. What matters is whether you have the discipline and full will to learn by yourself. Remember, NEVER GIVE UP :) that is the most important and basic principle to follow.


4) Again, true AND untrue. tripods are essential if you want to reduce camera shakes, but don't rely on it too much. If you do that, eventually You will be a cripple without your tripod. At some places, you aren't even allowed to USE your tripods, so what will you do then? It's best to Practice without the tripod at the beginning. It's just like learning to ride a bike. You fall now and then and eventually you can ride steadily. Low light areas are really tricky so you can't avoid using a tripod. Only for THAT is an exception.

An example of 'NO TRIPOD' sign. it's very common to find in places like museums 

and exhibitions (cr: www.flickr.com) 

     Flashguns aren't really of a need unless you are taking it to the next level or being those event photographers. You can consider these at a later point in time, after you have developed the skills of photography, as you need to operate, sync etc with your DSLR. Moreover it isn't really cheap to get those so it's best to buy them when you feel you are ready and feel that you want to bring it to the next level




Hope that the misconceptions have been cleared. Now the question you might ask now is 'What do I do next?'

Well look out for my next blog coming real soon!